Manufacturing & Defense · Illustrative Engagement Scenario

How a Manufacturer Can Reach CMMC 2.0 Compliance in 90 Days

Tier 2 DoD Defense Contractor (Confidential) · 850 employees

Illustrative scenario. Illustrative/composite scenario. Figures shown are examples for discussing the approach, not verified customer results or a forecast for your organization. Actual outcomes and timelines depend on scope, implementation, and independent assessment.
90 Days
Time to CMMC Level 2 Certification
$24M
Annual DoD Contract Revenue Protected
110/110
NIST 800-171 Controls Implemented
0
Audit Findings at Certification
The Challenge

CMMC Level 2 Required. The Infrastructure Wasn’t Ready.

A Tier 2 defense contractor needed CMMC Level 2 certification to maintain DoD contracts but had significant gaps in security controls, no formal security program, and legacy infrastructure that couldn’t meet compliance requirements.

The clock was already compressed: a C3PAO assessment date was on the calendar, tied to a contract renewal, leaving no room for the phased 12-to-18-month security program build-out that CMMC readiness typically takes. The gap wasn’t a handful of missing technical controls — it was the absence of the governance artifacts a Level 2 assessor requires alongside the technical controls themselves: a System Security Plan that didn’t exist yet, no formal Plan of Action & Milestones process, and production and engineering systems that had never been segmented from the systems handling Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI).

The Armorstack Response

A Coordinated Sprint Across Three Portfolios

VERITY

vCISO services led the CMMC Level 2 readiness sprint end to end: a control-by-control gap assessment against all 110 NIST SP 800-171 Rev. 2 requirements, System Security Plan (SSP) development, and — for anything that couldn’t be fully closed inside the 90-day window — a Plan of Action & Milestones (POA&M) with a committed remediation date. CMMC Level 2 certification sits directly on top of that underlying NIST 800-171 assessment and SSP; a C3PAO assessor doesn’t score controls in isolation, they score whether the SSP accurately describes how each control is actually implemented in that specific environment.

AI-assisted documentation accelerated first-draft SSP language and control-to-evidence mapping — drafting the “how this control is implemented here” narrative for each of the 110 requirements from configuration data, log samples, and existing IT documentation, and producing a first-pass mapping between implemented controls and CMMC assessment objectives. None of that draft language shipped unreviewed: every AI-drafted narrative went through a two-stage human check, first for technical accuracy against the actual environment, then cross-checked against the specific NIST 800-171A assessment procedure a C3PAO assessor would apply. An SSP describing a control that isn’t really implemented, or implemented differently than described, is a direct path to a failed assessment — so the AI compressed drafting time, not evidentiary accuracy, and every finalized narrative carried an explicit reviewer sign-off.

SENTRY

Deployed a Zero Trust architecture scoped to CMMC’s access-control and system-and-communications-protection domains — network segmentation isolating CUI-handling systems from the general corporate network, identity threat detection and response (ITDR) tuned to the credential-based attack patterns the IA and AC control families exist to prevent, and privileged access management (PAM) to close the AC.L2 controls governing administrative and elevated accounts. A SIEM platform was stood up specifically to satisfy the audit (AU) control family: CMMC assessors expect documented evidence that log review, retention, and alerting are actually operating, not just that logging exists, and 24/7 SOC monitoring gave the deployment a live response function rather than an archive nobody watches.

CORE

Infrastructure modernization addressed the environment underneath the policy work: network segmentation to define a discrete CUI enclave, migration of CUI-handling workloads to Azure GovCloud, and a backup architecture with air-gapped, offline copies. That backup design maps directly to the contingency-planning (CP) and system-and-information-integrity (SI) control families — a requirement that on-prem backup running on the same network it protects cannot satisfy, since a ransomware event that reaches production also reaches a backup target that’s still network-reachable.

Outcomes

What Changed

Achieved CMMC Level 2 certification in 90 days while maintaining $24M in annual DoD contract revenue.

Security program maturity increased from ad-hoc to managed and measurable, with all 110 NIST 800-171 controls fully implemented.

Ongoing compliance monitoring was established post-certification, with the initial assessment closing at zero audit findings.

How These Composite Figures Are Built

Illustrative/composite scenario. Figures shown are examples for discussing the approach, not verified customer results or a forecast for your organization. Actual outcomes and timelines depend on scope, implementation, and independent assessment.

Converged Cybersecurity, IT & Physical Security

Ready for Results Like These?

If your organization is staring down a CMMC Level 2 assessment date with an SSP that doesn’t exist yet, no POA&M process, and DoD contract revenue riding on getting there — that compressed timeline is exactly what this engagement model is built for. Let’s talk about your assessment date.Talk to Armorstack →

← Back to all case studies

877-890-5508 · [email protected]